UPDATE: September 23, 2018
UPDATE: Jan. 6, 2019
Still no evidence that President Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election. There wasn't any proof to begin with.
November 14, 2017
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on the investigation into the Russia collusion allegations and Attorney General Jeff Sessions considering a special counsel investigation into potential Clinton Foundation ties to the Uranium One deal. No evidence of collusion with Trump and Russia at this point at time stamp 3:16.
November 5, 2017 Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) says that she has seen no evidence so far that Trump's campaign received hacked Clinton campaign emails from Russia. No collusion.
Oct. 26, 2017 House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah) discusses the investigation into the Uranium One deal, the alleged Trump-Russia collusion and Russian influence on the U.S. presidential election. He says once and for all that if you are waiting for President Trump to be impeached for "collusion with Russia to win the 2016 election," then you are wasting your time, because it's never going to happen.
(Below)
THIS MAN IS LYING TO YOU! He's also suspected to be the one leaking false information about the the investigation that the House Intelligence Committee is doing.
December 10, 2017
Then show us this "damning" evidence, please.
As I update my website and move to the new domain there is STILL no proof and "Shifty" is still talking out of both sides of his mouth and making up these lies. (9/23/18)
December 16, 2017
This interview is super vague. He can't say anything is happening for sure. He says he wants to make sure Bob Mueller finds something.
That sounds like Mueller hasn't found anything yet.
It also sounds like Bob Mueller is search for a crime instead of investigating one. That is not how our justice system works.
ADAM SCHIFF IS A LIAR! If there is evidence then show it. He can't because there isn't any. He is the only one in congress saying anything about evidence. All other reps and senators Republican or Democrat have said they've seen no evidence.
This is a sick attempt to keep this Russia Collusion narrative alive.
He can't give one example of hard proof and talks in circles with all vague terms.
All the indictments made have had nothing to do with President Trump and all the contacts with Russia have been perfectly normal for a transition team.
This is smoke and mirrors to get you not to look at what is really going on here. There is damning evidence that the Obama Administration was colluding with the Clinton Campaign and even Russia, to install Hillary Clinton as the president.
It is now blowing up in their faces. This Russian Collusion Delusion was made up to make Hillary feel better and to cover up what they were really doing. This is the way they are keeping President Trump from getting anything done, covering up their own corruption, all while also keeping a very close eye on, every move he makes, as well as, every move his surrogates make.
These democrats try to just explain away the Clinton and Obama corruption. But don't fall for it. They were the ones really colluding with Russia.
October 23, 2017
Gowdy to Rosenstein on Russia probe: 'Finish it the hell up'
Published on Jun 28, 2018
Republican lawmaker tells Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray that America is being 'torn apart' by the investigation during a House hearing on anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok.
Still no evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia
(Please excuse the crappy quality.)
MSM has gone completely nuts and if you aren’t paying close enough attention and watching entire un-edited testimonies, entire un-edited press conferences or entire un-edited interviews, you may not have gotten the memo yet. Brace yourself, because if you watch CNN this is going to come as a huge surprise to you….
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP TEAM AND RUSSIA.
Not only is there no evidence of collusion, but this investigation has been happening since at least July of 2016, and nothing has been found.
The only indictments have been for crimes unrelated to the original scope of the investigation, except for the 13 Russians that were indicted and will probably never be extradited.
As of September 23, 2018 there is still no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russians to win the 2016 Presidential Election.
The only thing we can say is that yes Russians tried to influence the election. As they always do. As do many other countries. As do we try to influence other country's elections.
There has been been evidence suggesting that the Obama Administration FBI and DOJ as well as the Hillary Clinton campaign colluded with foreign entities, (UK, Australia,) in order to spy on the Trump Campaign. But that is still being investigated. Stay tuned.
Nunes: No Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion, Clear Effort To Undermine President Through Leaks (March 19, 2017)
Devin Nunes confirms NO COLLUSION BETWEEN “TRUMP WORLD” AND RUSSIANS
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday that FBI Director James Comey's appearance on Capitol Hill backed up assertions that there was no collusion between President Donald Trump's campaign and Russia.
BREAKING NEWS ! CNN admit NO collusion with Russia !
During an interview with Kasie Hunt, Rep. Peter King said he's seen no evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia – and that “circumstantial evidence” is not enough.
There is no evidence of collusion with Russia. The real issue is the unbelievable.
-Published on Mar 20, 2017
"There is no evidence of collusion with Russia. The real issue is the unbelievable amount of classified information that has been illegally leaked, putting our national security at risk – must get to the bottom of it!" -President Donald J Trump
- Former FBI Director James Comey refuses to deny he briefed President Obama on calls made by Michael Flynn to Russia.
- The NSA and FBI tell Congress that Russia did not influence the electoral process of the 2016 Presidential Election.
- NSA Director Adm. Rogers tells Congress unmasking individuals endangers National security.
- FBI Director Comey says classified leaks to the media have been "unusually active" recently
- DNI Clapper "right" to say no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign
- FBI Director: Leaks of classified info should be prosecuted.
- FBI Director: Won't confirm any public conversations with Obama, Trump in public.
- FBI Director: Russia intel did not deal directly with WikiLeaks.
James Comey and Adm. Rogers Testifiy - House Hearing On Russian Attempts To Interfere.
And now you have your lying Swamp Rat Schiff, Lies on National Television.
DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!
Fake News!
The top House Intelligence Committee Democrat, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) dropped a bombshell on Donald Trump by saying there's more than circumstantial evidence against Trump for Russia collusion.
And yes he lied. Everyone else says no evidence of collusion between the Trump Camp. and Russia.
Regarding the new evidence that Devin Nunes recently found, (March 2017,) he stated that it has nothing to do with Russia.
At the time Mr. Schiff did the above interview he had not seen any new evidence to suggest a new conclusion. This was just grandstanding, and a blatant lie to further the Russian collusion narrative.
He has backpedaled since. (Next video)
As Reported by The Washington Times:
Rep. Adam Schiff says it’s premature to conclude that members of the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to interfere in the general election.
Asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper whether he can “say definitively that there was collusion” between members of the campaign and Moscow to meddle in the presidential race, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said it’s too early to tell.
“We can say, conclusively, this is something that needs to be thoroughly investigated,” Mr. Schiff said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “But it’s way premature to be reaching conclusions.”
“We are still at the very early stage of the investigation,” he said. “The only thing I can say is that it would be irresponsible for us not to get to the bottom of this.”
The California Democrat previously said he had seen “more than circumstantial evidence” to suggest members of the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia to interfere in the presidential race.
“I can tell you that the case is more than that,” Mr. Schiff said last month on “State of the Union.” “And I can’t go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”
At that time, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican, said he wasn’t aware of the evidence cited by Mr. Schiff.
March 27, 2017
Nunes clarifies first visit to White House -
The chairman of the House intelligence committee told Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" Monday that "there was no sneaking around" when he met with the secret source behind his claim that President Trump's associates were caught up in "incidental" surveillance.
"We go to the executive branch at least once or twice a week," Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., told host Bill O'Reilly. "This is not unusual, because there are intelligence products that we don’t have access to in the House of Representatives, although we do have the clearances to see them.
"So, we’ve known about this long before Trump actually sent his famous tweet out about the ‘wiretapping’ at Trump Tower," Nunes went on. "We’ve known that there was additional unmasking of Americans’ names. We’ve had sources that have provided that information. And so, what I had to do was that I needed a place that I could actually go and find this information and review it."
The chairman said he did not go to the West Wing or speak to Trump on the day he met his source, and re-emphasized that the information he reviewed "had nothing to do with Russia. That's the key here."
Nunes' confirmation that he met with the source on the White House grounds prompted Democrats to call for him to recuse himself from the committee's ongoing investigation into possible ties between Russian officials and members of Trump's campaign.
Backed by House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., Nunes struck a defiant tone, telling O'Reilly, "I’m sure the Democrats do want me to quit, because they know that I’m quite effective at getting to the bottom of things."
The congressman was cleared of revealing classified information while overseeing the Russia investigation; Catherine Herridge goes in-depth for 'Special Report.'